And what about the contents?
André
G. Côté, Director-general
The
year is almost coming to an end but it is too
early to draw conclusions. A few days before our
departure for Geneva, and before the WSIS is inaugurated,
the aims and the means of the event remain as
vague and ambiguous and two year before. The World
Summit on the Information Society has created
many expectations within the community of NGO’s,
in the Civil Society and even in the industry.
In
the proposed Action Plan, we talk about digital
solidarity, national cyberstrategies, and all
facets of the Information and Communication Technologies
(ICT’s) without distinguishing the conventional
analogical processes from the digital interactive
production as we know it today. The statistical
models defined during the last century don’t
fit anymore with the daily changes characterizing
the reality in this sector.
FIAM
has produced a discussion paper (read
more) on the question of industrial classification
in the Multimedia and Interactive Digital Content
(MIDC) Industry. The lack of indicators and the
paucity of their significance with reference to
the reality of the digital content production
doesn’t permit to draw an accurate description
of the situation in the emerging countries.
The
composite ICT Development Index suggested in the
Plan of Action could play a role in better defining
the sector, provided that the recommendations
included in the FIAM document are adopted.
The
International Telecommunication Union launched
last month its Digital Access Index (DAI), the
first global index to rank Information and Communication
Technology (ICT) access. Its defines access according
to ITU’s database of telecommunication indicators
in the World, but doesn’t say much about
how many, and who produces digital content, and
in what way they contribute to the local economy.
FIAM
would be ready to work actively, with the help
of its associative network, with ITU, NAICS, NACE,
JSIC (Japan), ISIC and all partners wishing to
tackle this question in view to bring the needed
changes in the actual classification. Without
those modifications, the data on connectivity
will not be very eloquent on the creation of digital
content, on cultural and linguistic diversity,
and on the industry that is behind it.
Digital
Access Index (DAI):
http://www.itu.int/newsroom/press_releases/2003/30.html
http://unstats.un.org/unsd/
Back
to top
|